白宮發布拜登的“文化常態“論

俄羅斯莫斯科喀秋莎農場 仰望七星
編輯 水星 上傳 銀河

vaandel.co.za

2月17日,白宮將拜登為中共的種族滅絕罪開脫的對話原稿全部發布【1】,這是他接受CNN白左記者庫珀(Coop)采訪所言。現將涉及中共國部分摘譯,供戰友參考。

拜登:我們之所以能夠與世界其他國家競爭如此激烈,其中壹個原因是我們的主要競爭對手大多具有排外心理。妳還記得——我記得我從中(共)國回來的時候妳問過我,我說,“我預測,用不了壹年,他們將結束他們的獨生子女政策( their One China policy)。”我受到了攻擊——說——因為他們說拜登說話不靠譜——這是多麽不道德。那是在我們和共和黨候選人競爭的時候,由米特·羅姆尼領導,壹個好人。

庫珀:我想妳剛剛和中共國家主席習談過了。

拜登:是的,2個小時。

庫珀:維吾爾人怎麽辦?中共國侵犯人權問題怎麽辦?

拜登:我們必須捍衛人權,這是我們(的標準)。我們不能——對他指責,(要求)他也是這樣——我很了解他,他也很了解我,我們有兩個小時的談話。

庫珀:妳跟他談過這個?

拜登:我也談過這個,這並不是什麽難民問題,但我說的是——我說——聽著,妳知道,中(共)國領導人——如果妳對中國歷史有任何了解的話,那壹直都是——中國歷史上在沒有統壹的時候,飽受戰亂的蹂躪。因此,習近平的核心——核心原則是,必須有壹個統壹的、嚴密控制的中(共)國。而他所做的都是基於這個道理。

我向他指出,任何壹位美國總統如果不體現美國的價值觀,他就不可能繼續擔任總統。基於這壹點,我不打算說反對他在香港做什麽,他對中(共)國西部地區的維吾爾人和臺灣做什麽,試圖強硬地推行壹個中國政策(the One China policy)——我說——他說他——他明白了。在文化常態上,每個國家和他們的領導人都遵循不同的準則。

但我的觀點是,當我和他會面回來,經過了17000英裏的行程,當時我是副總統,他是副主席——
這就是為什麽我這麽了解他,是應胡主席的要求——不是開玩笑——他的前任胡主席——奧巴馬總統希望我們互相了解,因為他會成為主席。

我回來說他們要結束中(共)國的獨生子女政策(their One China — their one child policy),因為他們太排斥外國人,不讓任何人進去,退休的人比工作的人還多,更多的人都是退休的了,他們如何維持經濟增長?

庫珀:不過,當妳和他談論侵犯人權的問題時,這是否只是——就美國而言,是這樣嗎?或者對中共國有什麽實際影響?

拜登:嗯,對中共國會有影響,他知道這壹點。我要表明的是,事實上,我們將繼續重申我們作為聯合國和其他人權機構發言人的作用,這些機構對他們的態度有影響。

中共國正非常努力地試圖成為世界領袖並獲得這個稱號,要做到這壹點,他們必須贏得其他國家的信任。只要他們從事與基本人權背道而馳的活動,他們就很難做到這壹點。但要比這復雜得多。我不應該在電視上花10分鐘內談論中共國的政策。

庫珀先生:好吧,讓我把問題帶回美國……

評:CNN的這次采訪算是向世界提了個醒,拜登正在扮演中共爪牙的角色,如果美國、世界不予以及時阻止,任其發展下去,邪惡將蔓延全球!

“如果妳對中國歷史有任何了解的話,那壹直都是——中國在沒有統壹的時候,飽受戰亂的蹂躪。因此,習近平的核心——核心原則是,必須有壹個統壹的、嚴密控制的中(共)國。” 這段真是鸚鵡學舌習近平,中共怎樣教他,他就怎樣說!

“我們將繼續重申我們作為聯合國和其他人權機構發言人的作用,這些機構對他們的態度有影響。”這句指望聯合國人權機構對邪共產生影響,如同指望WHO調查CCP病毒。

由美國川普政府的國務院1月19日定下的“中共對新疆維吾爾族人犯下種族滅絕和反人類罪“,現在上任還未滿壹個月的拜登就想用泛泛的人權問題為中共罪行開脫,並且以”文化常態“來抹黑中國人,這激起了全世界人的憤怒。

還有壹個翻譯過程中發現的問題,“獨生子女政策”(one child policy)和“壹個中國政策”(One China policy),此文中出現了3次”One China”,只有最後壹次有前後文,也專門解釋了,我們知道拜登指的是中共的獨生子女政策,那開頭他說自己當副總統的時候從中共國回來就說不出壹年,他們將停止的也是“獨生子女政策”。但中間說到香港、維吾爾族人和臺灣問題時,他再次提到 One China policy時,我理解拜登不是指“獨生子女政策”,而是在說“壹個中國政策”。

眾所周知,關於中共的國策既有之前被實行了幾十年後來被停止執行的獨生子女政策,也有長期宣傳實行的“壹國兩制”、“壹中壹臺”等強調“壹個中國”的外交政策。這裏顯然拜登已經自己把自己弄糊塗了,他壹個”One China policy” 將中共的壹個內政和壹個外交政策放壹鍋胡亂燉了。

哎,就這樣的美國總統和他的白宮對中共能有什麽殺傷力嗎?

原文鏈接:

【1】https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/17/remarks-by-president-biden-in-a-cnn-town-hall-with-anderson-cooper/

附上原文部分(整稿後段):

THE PRESIDENT:……And it shows up — one of the reasons why we have been able to compete with the rest of the world so well is most of our major competitors are xenophobic. You remember quite — I remember you questioned me when I came back from China. And I said, “I predict, within less than a year, they’re going to end their One China policy.” And I got clobbered by — saying — because they said Biden didn’t talk about the fact that — how immoral it was. And it was when we were running against a Republican ticket, led by Mitt Romney — a fine guy.

MR. COOPER: You just talked to China’s President, I believe.

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, for two hours.

MR. COOPER: What about the Uyghurs? What about the human rights abuses in China?

THE PRESIDENT: We must speak up for human rights. It’s who we are. We can’t — my comment to him was — and I know him well, and he knows me well. We’re — a two-hour conversation.

MR. COOPER: You talked about this to him?

THE PRESIDENT: I talked about this, too. And that’s not so much refugee, but I talked about — I said — look, you know, Chinese leaders — if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been — the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven’t been unified at home. So the central — to vastly overstate it — the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.

I point out to him: No American President can be sustained as a President if he doesn’t reflect the values of the United States. And so the idea I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan, trying to end the One China policy by making it forceful — I said — and by the — he said he — he gets it. Culturally, there are different norms that each country and they — their leaders — are expected to follow.

But my point was that when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president — that’s how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu — not a joke — his predecessor, President Hu — and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another because he was going to be the president.

And I came back and said they’re going to end their One China — their one child policy, because they’re so xenophobic, they won’t let anybody else in, and more people are retired than working. How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?

MR. COOPER: When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? Or is there any actual repercussions for China?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that. What I’m doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other — other agencies that have an impact on their attitude.

China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries. And as long as they’re engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it’s going to be hard for them to do that.

But it’s much more complicated than that. I’m — I shouldn’t have tried to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.

MR. COOPER: Well, let me — let me bring it back to the United States……

+1
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sunflower1
13 天 前

此貨真是只狗

0