【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(八)

翻譯:mutanhuokaorou | 校對:Tom Cat | 編輯、美工:滅共小宇宙

往期鏈接:

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(一)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(二)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(三)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(四)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(五)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(六)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(七)

———————

VII. 2020 Election Voting Machine Irregularities

VII. 2020年大選投票機違規

Perhaps no device illustrates that technology is a double-edged sword than the machines and associated software that have come to be used to tabulate votes across all 50 states. Types of voting equipment include optical scanners used to process paper ballots, direct recording electronic systems which voters can use to directly input their choices, and various marking devices to produce human-readable ballots.

也許用來給所有50個州的選票製表的機器和相關軟件最能說明技術是一把雙刃劍。投票設備的類型包括用於處理紙票的光學掃描儀、選民可以直接在上面輸入他們所選擇內容的直接記錄電子系統以及各種標記設備來產生人們便於閱讀的選票。

Two main types of voting machine irregularities have been alleged in the 2020 presidential election. As Table 7 illustrates, these types of irregularities include large-scale voting machine inaccuracies together with inexplicable vote switching and vote surges, often in favor Joe Biden.

在2020年總統大選中,有兩種​​主要類型的投票機違規行為。如圖表7所示,這些類型的違規行為包括大規模的投票機失準以及難以解釋的選票替換和選票激增,這些違規行為通常都有利於喬·拜登。

表7:2020年投票機違規

亞利桑那佐治亞密歇根內華達賓夕法尼亞威斯康星
大範圍投票機失準
難以解釋且偏向拜登的選票替換和選票激增

√=普遍證據 *=某些證據

Large-Scale Voting Machine Inaccuracies

大範圍投票機失準

Much has been made about the shadowy genesis of a company called Dominion which provides voting machines and equipment to 28 states. According to critics, Dominion’s roots may be traced to an effort by the Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez to rig his sham elections. Dominion is also alleged to have ties to the Clinton Foundation, while the Smartmatic software used in the Dominion machines is alleged to have links to the shadowy anti-Trump globalist financier George Soros.

關於一家名為Dominion(多米尼)的公司的陰暗起源已有了很多報導,該公司為28個州提供投票機和設備。據評論家說,多米尼的根源也許可以追溯到委內瑞拉獨裁者烏戈·查韋斯為操縱假選舉所作的努力。多米尼據稱還與克林頓基金會有關聯,而據稱多米尼機器中使用的Smartmatic軟件與陰暗的反川普全球主義者金融家喬治·索羅斯有聯繫。

The controversy swirling over Dominion and Smartmatic notwithstanding, one of the biggest problems with machine inaccuracies may be traced to a company called Agilis. Nevada election officials in Clark County, a Democrat stronghold in Nevada, used Agilis signature verification machines to check over 130,000 mail- in ballot signatures.

儘管多米尼和Smartmatic的爭議不斷,但有關設備失準的最大問題之一可以追溯到一家名為Agilis(艾格里斯)的公司。內華達州選舉官員在民主黨據點克拉克縣使用Agilis簽名驗證機檢查了130,000份郵寄投票的簽名。

According to a court case filed in the First Judicial District Court in Carson City, the Agilis machines used a “lower image quality than suggested by the manufacturer.” Clark County Election Department officials also lowered the accuracy rate below the manufacturer’s recommendations, making the whole verification process unreliable. 

根據卡森市第一司法地區法院提起的訴訟,Agilis設備使用了“低於製造商建議的圖像質量”。克拉克縣選舉部官員也將準確率降低到製造商的建議以下,從而使整個驗證過程不可靠。

In a test run, it was proven that, at the manufacturer’s setting, the Agilis machine already had a high tolerance for inaccuracies—as high as 50% non-matching. In other words, half of the ballots that might be moved through the machine would be impossible to verify; and Clark County officials lowered that threshold even further.

在一次測試運行中,Agilis設備的出廠設置就被驗證有著相當大的失準– 高達50%的無法匹配。換句話說,可能有一半使用過該設備的選票是根本無法查驗的;而克拉克縣的官員把這個匹配度降得更低。

As a final comment on this case, there is also the broader legal matter that the Agilis machines were used to “entirely replace signature verification by election personnel.” This is contrary to Nevada state law.

作為對此案的最終評論,還有著更廣泛的法律問題,即選舉工作人員使用Agilis機器“完全替換了簽名驗證信息”。這違反了內華達州法律。

As noted in a court case: “In violation of Nevada law, the Clark County Election Department allows the Agilis machine to solely verify 30% of the signatures accompanying the mail-in ballots without ever having humans inspect those signatures.”

正如在一個法院案件中指出的那樣:“在與內華達州法律相違背的情況下,克拉克縣選舉部允許Agilis設備在無人為核查的情況下驗證了30%的郵寄選票隨附簽名。”

A similar problem has been alleged in a court filing in Arizona with a software known as the Novus 6.0.0.0. In cases where ballots were too damaged or illegible to be read by vote tabulation machines, Novus was used in an attempt to cure or restore the ballots. The system would do so by trying to read the applicable scans of the original rejected ballots. However, as noted in a court case filed by Kelli Ward, Chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party: “the software was highly inaccurate, and it often flipped the vote.” 

在亞利桑那州的法院文件中,一款名為Novus 6.0.0.0的軟件也被指存在類似問題。如果選票過於殘破或難以辨認,以致無法通過選票製表機讀取,則使用Novus來試圖修復或還原選票。該系統通過嘗試讀取原始被拒絕選票的適用掃描來完成此操作。但是,正如亞利桑那州共和黨主席凱利·沃德(Kelli Ward)提起的訴訟中所指出的那樣:“該軟件高度失準,而且經常會使選票結果相反。”

Inexplicable Vote Switching and Vote Surges In Favor of Biden

難以解釋且偏向拜登的選票替換和選票激增

As a further complication to the Novus software problem in Arizona referenced above, the software was not only highly inaccurate. According to observers, and as an example of inexplicable vote switching, “the software would erroneously prefill ‘Biden’ twice as often as it did ‘Trump.’”

上面提到的亞利桑那州的Novus軟件進一步複雜化的問題是,該軟件不僅僅是高度失準,這裡有個關於難以解釋的選票替換的例子,根據觀察員的觀點,“該軟件經常會在每次登記’川普’時錯誤地換成兩次’拜登’。”

At least one instance of a large and inexplicable vote switching and vote surge in favor of Joe Biden took place in Antrim County, Michigan – and it is associated with the controversial aforementioned Dominion-Smartmatic voting machine hardware-software combo. In this Republican stronghold, 6,000 votes were initially, and incorrectly, counted for Joe Biden. The resulting vote totals were contrary to voter registration and historical patterns and therefore raised eyebrows. When a check was done, it was discovered that the 6,000 votes were actually for Donald J. Trump .

至少有一個難以解釋的大範圍且偏向拜登的選票替換和選票激增的例子是在密歇根州的安特里姆縣發生,且與有爭議的上述“Dominion-Smartmatic”硬件-軟件組合有關。在這個共和黨據點,最初有6000選票不正確地統計給了喬·拜登。最終的投票總數與選民的登記和歷史記錄背道而馳,因此令人震驚。完成檢查後才發現6,000張選票實際上是唐納德·J·川普的。

A subsequent forensic audit of the Antrim County vote tabulation found that the Dominion system had an astonishing error rate of 68 percent. By way of comparison, the Federal Election Committee requires that election systems must have an error rate no larger than 0.0008 percent.

隨後通過對安特里姆縣投票表進行法醫式審計發現,多米尼系統的錯誤率高達驚人的68%。作為對比,聯邦選舉委員會要求選舉系統的錯誤率必須低於0.0008%。

Perhaps even more troubling given concerns over hackers and Dominion’s alleged ties to bad foreign actors, the records that would have allowed the detection of remote internet access went missing from the Antrim County system. This was in direct violation of Michigan state law, which requires retention of voting records for 22 months — such information was in place for previous election years, but not this election. At the very least, the results of this audit indicates the need for further investigation of the Dominion system across other states in the country.

或許更令人不安的是對黑客的擔憂以及多米尼涉嫌與不良國外分子的聯繫,安特里姆縣系統丟失了可以檢測到遠程互聯網訪問的記錄。這直接違反了密歇根州法律,該法律要求將投票記錄保留22個月-此類信息適用於之前的選舉年,但不包含本次選舉。至少,這次審核的結果表明需要對本國其他州的多米尼系統進行深入調查。

In Georgia, there were numerous “glitches” with the Dominion machines where the results would change. The most notable of these changes was a 20,000 vote surge for Biden and 1,000 vote decrease for Trump.

在佐治亞州,多米尼設備存在很多會導致結果發生變化的“小故障”。其中最值得注意的一個是,當川普的投票減少了1,000的同時,拜登的投票激增了20,000。

更多精彩內容請關注:

0
0 則留言
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

七星会(为子孙爱七哥)

美国纽约七星会农场(原名:为子孙爱七哥农场),是距离七哥最近的农场。总部位于美国纽约曼哈顿。 我们坚信(并以此为使命)郭先生所倡导的正道主义是人类的新信仰,而且会成为新人类的信仰,当地球不适合居住时,人类会把正道主义信仰带到新的星球,永远传承。 我们的目标是跟随郭先生建立以契约精神和正道主义信仰为核心的新中国联邦国家文化。 我们的口号是: 欢迎加入~ 距离七哥最近的农场 感应七哥神奇的能量 12月 24日