【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(七)

翻譯:Tom Cat | 校對:朝陽| 編輯、美工:滅共小宇宙

往期鏈接:

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(一)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(二)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(三)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(四)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(五)

【納瓦羅報告】完美的騙局:大選中主要的六種違規行為(六)

———————

VI. Equal Protection Clause Violations

VI. 平等保護條款違例

The Equal Protection Clause is part of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution and a fundamental pillar of the American Republic. This Equal Protection Clause mandates that no State may deny its citizens equal protection of its governing laws.

平等保護條款是美國憲法第十四條修正案的一部分,也是美利堅合眾國的根本支柱。平等保護條款規定,任何州不能否認其公民受到該地區管轄法律的平等保護。

Table 6 illustrates three major alleged violations of the Equal Protection Clause in the 2020 presidential election. As the table illustrates, each violation was observed to occur across all six battleground states.

圖表6列舉了在2020年美國總統競選中三個主要的涉嫌違反平等保護條款的行為。如表所示,在六個戰場州中,每一項違規都存在。

圖表6:六個戰場州違反平等保護條款的情況

Higher Standards of Certification & ID Verification Applied to In-Person Voters

對親自投票的選民採取更高標準的認證與身份核實

The first alleged violation focuses on the application of higher standards of certification and voter identification for in-person voters than mail-in and absentee ballot voters. In effect, these higher standards disproportionately benefited the candidacy of Joe Biden because President Trump had a much higher percentage of in-person voters than mail-in and absentee voters. Indeed, mail-in and absentee ballots were largely skewed for Joe Biden across the country by ratios as high as 3 out of 4 votes in some states.

第一起被指控的違規行為集中於對親自投票的選民採用比郵寄選票和不在場選票更高的身份認證標準。實際上,這些更高的標準不成比例地有利了喬·拜登的競選,因為在百分比上,川普總統在親自投票上比郵寄與缺席投票上佔有更高的比例。事實上,在全國范圍內,郵寄和缺席選票很大程度上偏向喬·拜登,在某些州的比例高達四分之三。

Note here that much of the alleged fraud and ballot mishandling focused on mail-in voters and absentee ballots. Therefore, the lower the level of scrutiny of these voters, the more illegal votes for Joe Biden relative to Donald Trump could slip in. It should likewise be noted here that this particular violation of the Equal Protection Clause was further enabled by poll watchers being denied meaningful observation. 

需要注意的是,許多所謂的欺詐和選票處理不當都集中於郵寄選票和缺席選票中。因此,對這類選民的審查水平越低,相對於唐納德·川普,喬·拜登獲得的非法選票就越多。這裡同樣應當指出的是,由於投票監督員拒絕接受有異議的監督這種特別違反平等保護條款的行為被進一步擴大。

Perhaps the most egregious examples of this particular violation of the Equal Protection clause occurred in Georgia and Michigan. Georgia, for example, requires ID for voting in-person and Michigan will only allow provisional voting without an ID. However, in both Georgia and Michigan , a valid ID is not required to vote by mail so long as the person has already registered in a previous election.

這種最令人震驚的特別違反平等保護條款的行為發生在佐治亞州和密歇根州。例如,佐治亞州要求親自投票必須有身份證,密歇根州只允許無身份證明的人進行臨時投票。然而,在佐治亞州和密歇根州,郵寄選票不需要有效身份證,只要當事人在以前選舉中登記過。

These procedures are ripe for fraud. In fact, there is evidence that election fraudsters targeted voters who had voted in past elections but not voted in more recent ones. These fraudsters could then cast ballots on behalf of these infrequent voters with little likelihood they would be caught. Numerous affidavits, however, detail persons arriving to vote at polls only to be informed that records indicate they had already voted. At least fourteen such affidavits have been made by Georgians.

這些程序很容易發生欺詐。事實上,有證據表明,選舉作假人員專門選中在過去選舉中投過票但在最近幾次選舉中沒有投票的選民。這些作假人員可以代表這些不常投票的選民投票,而且他們被抓的可能性很小。然而,選多宣誓書詳細闡述了前往投票處投票的人被告知記錄表明他們已經投票。佐治亞居民至少做出了十四封這樣的宣誓書。

As a further example, in Wisconsin, mail-in ballots were accepted without witness signatures placed properly in the allocated envelope location. A comparable process for in-person voting would have resulted in the invalidation of the vote.

再例如,在威斯康辛州,郵寄的選票沒有在分配的信封位置適當地放置證人簽名就被接受。此類似的過程如果發生在親自投票中將會導致投票無效。

Different Standards of Ballot Curing

不同標準的選票糾正

As a second major violation of the Equal Protection Clause, likewise observed across all six battleground states, different standards for correcting mistakes on ballots (ballot curing) were applied across different jurisdictions within the states. Often, jurisdictions with predominantly Democrat registration were more expansive about allowing the curing of ballots than jurisdictions with predominantly Republican registration.

統一發生在所有六個戰場州的第二個重大違反平等保護條款的事件是,各州不同司法管轄區對糾正選票錯誤(選票修正)採用了不同的標準。通常情況下,民主黨選民佔多數的選區比共和黨選民佔多數的選區在允許處理選票方面更為廣泛。

In Pennsylvania, there was a clear difference between how ballots were – or were not – cured in Republican counties versus Democrat counties. When Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued illegal guidance authorizing counties to cure ballots, this illegal guidance was not followed in at least eight different Republican counties. Meanwhile, ballots were cured in Democrat counties under this illegal guidance.

在賓夕法尼亞州,共和黨縣和民主黨縣的是否與如何進行選票修正上存在明顯差異。當賓夕法尼亞州的國務卿卡西·布克瓦發布授權各縣用於修正選票的非法指導文件,至少有八個不同的共和黨縣沒有遵循這一非法指導文件。與此同時,選票在民主黨縣中,在這種非法指導下被更正與修正。

In Arizona, there likewise was a clear difference between how in-person voters were treated versus mail-in ballots. On the one hand, mail-in voters had up to 5 days to “cure” or “fix” invalid mail-in ballots sent prior to Election Day. On the other hand, in-person voters in Maricopa County, for example, had to deal with poll workers who did not know how to work electronic voting machines properly. This resulted in thousands of in-person votes being marked incorrectly and disregarded rather than cured.

在亞利桑那州,親自投票和郵寄投票的區別也很明顯。一方面,郵寄選票的選民有5天的時間來“糾正”或“修正”在選舉日之前郵寄出去的無效選票。另一方面,例如在馬里科帕縣,親自投票的選民不得不面對不知道如何正確使用電子投票機的投票工作人員。這導致成千上萬的親自投票被錯誤標記並廢棄,而不是被糾正。

Differential and Partisan Poll Watcher Treatment

黨派間投票監督員不同的待遇

In most states, political party candidates and ballot issue committees are able to appoint poll watchers and observers to oversee the ballot counting process. Such poll watchers and observers must be registered voters and present certification to the Judge of Elections in order to be able to fulfill their duties at a polling location.

在大多數州,政黨候選人和選票發放委員會能夠任命投票監督員和觀察員監督計票過程。這些投票監督員和觀察員必須是登記選民,並且向選舉法官出示證明,才能在投票地點路線職責。

Such certified poll watchers should be free to observe at appropriate distances regardless of their party affiliation. Yet in key Democrat strongholds, eg, Dane County in Wisconsin and Wayne County in Michigan, which yielded high Biden vote counts, Republican poll watchers and observers were frequently subject to different treatment ranging from denial of entry to polling places to harassment and intimidation.

這些經過認證的投票監督員無論黨派分別,都應當能夠自由地在適當的距離觀察選票。但是,在民主黨的地盤,例如威斯康辛州的戴恩縣和密歇根州的韋恩縣,在這些拜登選票數量高的縣,共和黨的投票監督員和觀察員經常受到拒絕進入投票站,騷擾和恐嚇等不同待遇。

For example, in Georgia, a certified poll watcher witnessed other poll workers at a polling location discussing how they should not speak to her due to her party affiliation. In Pennsylvania, a Republican poll watcher was harassed and removed from the polling location due to his party affiliation. In Wisconsin, a Republican poll watcher was prevented from observing due to the fact that polling locations were not allowing Republicans in.

例如,在佐治亞州,一名認證的投票監督員目睹了投票站其他工作人員討論由於她的黨派關係,如何避免與她交流。在賓夕法尼亞州,一名共和黨的監督員因為他的黨派而遭受到騷擾並被趕出了投票站。在威斯康辛州,由於投票站禁止共和黨人進入,一名共和黨投票監督員被阻止監督。

Note the synergy here between the problem of the process foul involved with denying access to certified poll watchers (discussed in the previous section) and the violation of the Equal Protection Clause such conduct entails when such denial, harassment, and intimidation differs by party affiliation.

注意這裡的協同效應,拒絕獲得認證的投票監督員的訪問(前一節中討論過)所涉及的程序違規的問題,以及違反平等保護條款的行為使得這種拒絕、騷擾、恐嚇的事件因黨派不同而發生。

更多精彩內容請關注:

0
0 則留言
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

七星会(为子孙爱七哥)

美国纽约七星会农场(原名:为子孙爱七哥农场),是距离七哥最近的农场。总部位于美国纽约曼哈顿。 我们坚信(并以此为使命)郭先生所倡导的正道主义是人类的新信仰,而且会成为新人类的信仰,当地球不适合居住时,人类会把正道主义信仰带到新的星球,永远传承。 我们的目标是跟随郭先生建立以契约精神和正道主义信仰为核心的新中国联邦国家文化。 我们的口号是: 欢迎加入~ 距离七哥最近的农场 感应七哥神奇的能量 12月 24日