【世事解評】一個非專業人士的學習筆記——闫博士第三篇報告詳讀淺釋(3)

作者:紐約香草山寫作一組 霍比特人

Significant movements had also taken place in the scientific circle in the west. On February 19th, 2020, a statement signed by 27 experts was published on the influential journal Lancet13. In this statement, the scientists asserted a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 and condemned “conspiracy theories” that suggested a laboratory origin of the virus. It was later revealed through exposed email exchanges that, intriguingly, their assertion on the virus’ origin was accepted by the signees in the absence of any scientific discussions or supporting evidence14,15. Furthermore, the statement was organized secretly by Dr. Peter Daszak, CEO of the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance and long-term collaborator of Dr. Zhengli Shi and the WIV. In fact, it was through Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance that millions of NIH funding, which are US tax dollars, were channeled to the WIV and used presumably in military-civil fusion projects there. This conflict of interest (COI) was very likely what prompted Daszak to keep his central role in the Lancet statement under the radar. Though, the same COI somehow failed to discourage him from leading the WHO investigation of the origin of COVID-19 in 2021 and subsequently “concluding” that SARS-CoV-2 is “extremely unlikely” to have come from a laboratory. Interestingly, when the NIH funding was discontinued for EcoHealth Alliance in 2020, Daszak was immediately offered a donation of half a million dollars from an anonymous foundation (Figure 1). It is not known whether or not this donation played any role in encouraging Daszak’s actions in supporting the CCP government. 

【譯】巨大的行動同樣在西方科學界展開。2020年2月19日,27名專家聯名在著名雜志《柳葉刀》上發文,稱科學家們斷言新冠起源于自然,並譴責“陰謀論”,即認爲新冠起源于實驗室的說法。後來通過揭露的郵件可以看到,有趣的是他們對新冠自然起源的斷言是在沒有任何科學討論和支持性證據的情況下簽署的。另外,宣言是秘密地由彼得·達紮克——非盈利組織環保生態健康聯盟的CEO兼石正麗博士和武漢所的長期合作者——組織的。事實上,就是通過達紮克和環保生態健康聯盟,成百萬的NIH基金的錢——都是美國納稅人的錢——流向了武漢病毒研究所被用于軍民融合項目。這種利益衝突(COI)很可能推動達紮克低調地扮演了《柳葉刀》事件的主角。同樣的利益衝突使他無法擔任2020年WHO調查COVID-19起源的領導,該調查隨後得出結論說新冠極不可能來自實驗室。有趣的是,當NIH基金在2020年中止流向環保生態健康聯盟時,達紮克立即被一個匿名組織提供了50萬美元贊助(圖1)。這一贊助在達紮克支持中共政府的行動中扮演了什麽角色尚未可知。

Figure 1. Exposed email shows that an anonymous donation of $500,000 was made to EcoHealth Alliance to partially offset the NIH funds withdrawn. 

【譯】(圖1郵件大意)

蘭迪.謝克曼(諾獎得主)寫道:

我是理查.羅伯茨團隊成員並幫助串聯更多獲獎者參加阿紮和科林斯請願。我們不期待他們做出回應,但希望給你的重要工作做出幫助性的貢獻,因而參與串聯私人資金以彌補你的損失。我們的第一個成功是和一個以各種理由搞匿名贊助的基金取得的,理由包括支持生物醫學科學。我很高興報告這個團隊將提供環保生態聯盟50萬美元,以至少部分彌補從你的項目中抽走的NIH基金。因爲他們希望保持匿名,我將很高興擔當中間人給你的項目提供資金。我們可以繼續溝通如何進行下一步。

圖1揭露的郵件顯示一個匿名組織爲環保生態健康聯盟提供了50萬美元以彌補其因爲NIH基金抽走遭受的損失。

【淺釋】“利益衝突”(COI)是法律用語,簡單說就是甲和乙打官司,乙有個做律師的兒子丙,丙是不能接受甲的委托的,那樣他就處于利益衝突中,而不能保證爲委托人提供合格的服務。這裏達紮克與中共有巨大金錢關系,是不可以接受西方的委托調查病毒來源的。他秘密扮演串聯的角色爲中共服務,並可疑地獲得了來路不明的50萬美元。

【淺釋】“阿紮和科林斯請願”指的是2020年5月20日,77名美國獲獎者要求美國國立衛生研究院(NIH)院長科林斯,以及衛生和公共服務部部長阿紮采取緊急行動,審查NIH基金抽走資金中止與中國合作研究蝙蝠冠狀病毒的決定。也就是說,這些所謂科學家在新冠爆發後,爲了錢(科研資金)要求繼續與中共合作進行蝙蝠冠狀病毒的研究。

It is also worth mentioning that Dr. Linfa Wang from Duke-NUS Medical School and Dr. Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina, both long-term collaborators of Zhengli Shi and the WIV, also consciously distanced themselves from the Lancet statement to make sure that the statement “doesn’t link back to our collaboration” because “(o)therwise it looks self-serving and we lose impact” (Figure 2)16.

【譯】同樣值得注意的是來自杜克-新加坡國立大學的王林發博士和北卡羅來納大學的拉爾夫·巴裏克,兩者都是石正麗以及武漢所的長期合作夥伴,也有意遠離《柳葉刀》聲明以確保該聲明不會“牽連到我們的合作”,因爲“否則會顯得自私自利而我們將失去名聲”。(圖2)

Figure 2. Exposed email shows Peter Daszak, Linfa Wang, and Ralph Baric purposely avoided signing the Lancet statement although Daszak eventually signed likely because of the central role he played in organizing this statement.

【譯】(圖2郵件大意)

拉爾夫發的郵件:標題:不需要你在聲明上簽字。 內容:我也認爲這是個好決定,否則看起來自私自利而我們會失去名聲。

達紮克發的郵件:昨晚我和(王)林發談了關于我們散發的聲明,他認爲,我也同意,你、我和他都不應該在聲明上簽字,這樣能離它遠一點因而不會産生反效果。

吉姆·哈格斯、琳達·賽芙、休谟·菲爾德和麗塔.科爾韋爾我相信會簽的,然後今晚我會給一些關鍵人物發一圈。那樣我們就能用這種不會牽連到我們的合作的方式把它推開一點,以最大限度弄出一種獨立的聲音。

圖2:揭露的郵件顯示彼得·達紮克、王林發和拉爾夫有目的地回避簽署《柳葉刀》聲明,盡管達紮克最後因爲他扮演的中心人物角色不得不簽了。

【淺釋】這裏的敘述以及這些郵件表明,這些與中共勾結的西方科學家爲了錢秘密地私下串聯制造出僞科學的巨大聲音爲中共服務,而他們很清楚這是自私自利和丟臉的,所以盡量僞裝成與此無關,無恥而賣力地爲中共洗地。

In addition to the Lancet statement, on March 17th, 2020, an opinion article titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” was published on the top journal Nature Medicine17. Here the authors also asserted a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 despite that no convincing evidence was provided and that their theory was built upon the fabricated RaTG13 virus published by Zhengli Shi. Among the five authors of this article was Dr. Ian Lipkin from Columbia University, who, like Daszak, has close ties with China and has received several prestigious awards from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government in the past two decades18,19. 

【譯】作爲對《柳葉刀》聲明的補充,2020年3月,一份名爲“接近的新冠起源”的觀點文章發表在頂級刊物Nature Medicine上。該文作者也斷言新冠起源于自然,盡管沒有提供令人信服的證據,且其理論是建立在石正麗僞造的RaTG13基礎上的。五位作者中有來自哥倫比亞大學的伊恩·利普金博士,他和達紮克一樣與中共有密切關系且在過去二十年裏接受了中共許多顯赫的獎勵。

The Lancet statement and the Nature Medicine article, although baseless scientifically, both concluded that SARS-CoV-2 is a natural occurring pathogen. These publications had subsequently been promoted greatly on traditional media, social media, and other platforms. The result of these combined operations was to declare to the scientific community: SARS-CoV-2 having a natural origin is the official, accepted view; any dissenting voices would be condemned and dismissed by experts of the field

Therefore, unsurprisingly, although various scientific evidence continued to emerge pointing to the laboratory origin of SARS-CoV-2, much of such information was suppressed fairly efficiently. The public’s opinion of the virus’ origin remained dominated by the natural origin theory. 

【譯】《柳葉刀》聲明和Nature Medicine文章,盡管基本上都是非科學的,卻都得出結論說新冠是自然出現的病毒。這些刊物被大量推薦在傳統媒體、社交媒體和其他平台上。這些做法的綜合結果就是向科學界宣布,新冠起源于自然是官方結論,是既定的觀點,任何不同的聲音都會被自然起源理論所譴責。 

However, the truth was not meant to be blocked. While Dr. Yan continued to use the LUDE Media to expose various facts of COVID-19, including providing intelligence information (For example, pointing out that the Lancet statement was an organized effort to suppress the laboratory origin theories) and sharing her expert analyses on aspects of asymptomatic infections, antibody evaluation, autopsy studies, treatment strategies, vaccine development, etc., her identity was eventually discovered by the CCP government, which forced her to leave Hong Kong. At the end of April 2020, Dr. Yan successfully escaped from Hong Kong and arrived at the US. Here she continued to reveal the truth of SARS-CoV-2 to the world. On July 10th, 2020, Dr. Yan made her first public appearance on Fox News and, since then, has been continuing to spread the truth of COVID-19 on different platforms. The CCP’s defamation of Dr. Yan, which took place on both traditional media and social media involving CCP’s cyber army, also started right after Dr. Yan’s escape and came in huge waves continuously since then. 

【譯】總之,真相被有意遮蓋。當闫博士繼續在路德社上揭露各種COVID-19的真相,包括提供情報(例如指出《柳葉刀》聲明是有組織的試圖壓制實驗室起源說的努力)並且分享她在各個方面——無症狀感染、抗體評估、屍檢報告、治療方案、疫苗發展等——專業的分析的時候,中共終于發現了她的身份,這迫使她在2020年4月底離開了香港。闫博士成功逃離並抵達美國,在這裏她向全世界繼續揭露新冠的真相。2020年10月,闫博士第一次在福克斯新聞上公開露面,並且從那時起在各種平台持續傳播COVID-19的真相。自那時起,中共在傳統媒體和社交媒體(以其網絡軍)上對闫博士的誹謗也緊隨她的出走而持續如巨浪般湧來。

(未完待續)

校對/發稿:飛虹

更多資訊,歡迎訂閱美東香草山農場官方推特賬號

更多文稿,歡迎浏覽美東香草山GNEWS官方鏈接

更多香草山節目資訊,歡迎登陸G|TV — MOS Talk香草山訪談 & 香草山之聲

0
0 則留言
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments