The Wuhan Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the Validity of the Yan Reports Are Further Proved by the Failure of Two Uninvited “Peer Reviews”
Li-Meng Yan (MD, PhD)1, Shu Kang (PhD)1, Jie Guan (PhD)1, Shanchang Hu (PhD)1 1Rule of Law Society & Rule of Law Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Correspondence: [email protected]
A year has passed since the COVID-19 pandemic first started. Its damage so far is astonishing: 127 million people have been infected and, among them, 2.78 million died. These numbers continue to grow at a significant speed, indicating that the pandemic is far from being over. Furthermore, mutant viral strains continue to emerge, and no public policies or treatment strategies seem to be sufficiently effective in blocking COVID-19. There seems to be a consensus that the virus will not be eradicated and humans will continue to live under the influence of COVID-19 in the foreseeable future.
The defeat of humans by COVID-19 is for two fundamental reasons. First, SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, is not a naturally occurring pathogen but an Unrestricted Bioweapon. It has designed and significantly enhanced functions and therefore could not be controlled easily using strategies that would normally work for naturally occurring pathogens. It is a product of the bioweapons program of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government, the network of which includes not only the CCP scientists but also certain overseas scientists and organizations. SARS-CoV-2 was created based on template viruses ZC45 and ZXC21, which were originally discovered in bats by scientists of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The subsequent laboratory modifications had enabled its ability to infect humans as well as had enhanced the virus in its pathogenicity, transmissibility, and lethality.
The second fundamental reason of our defeat was that the world was made to look away from the true nature of SARS-CoV-2 and therefore responded inadequately on multiple aspects and occasions. A massive misinformation campaign has been undertaken by the CCP government to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV-2, which involved destroying data and samples, publishing fabricated viruses on top scientific journals, controlling the narrative of the origin debate through bribed top scientists and organizations, amplifying the falsified natural origin theory through media control, labeling all other origin theories as “conspiracy theories”, and defaming individuals who reveal the truth of SARS-CoV-2. As a result of the CCP’s efforts here, the true, weaponized nature of SARS-CoV-2 has been obscured and was not known by most of the public.
One example of the CCP’s misinformation campaign is the defamation of the Yan reports.
On September 14th, 2020, we published our first report1, where we provided abundant scientific evidence and analyses proving that SARS-CoV-2 must not be a product of natural evolution but a product of laboratory creation. We also postulated/reconstructed, based on substantial literature evidence, a pathway for the convenient laboratory creation of SARS-CoV-2. On October 8th, 2020, we published our second report2, where we used scientific evidence and logical analyses to uncover a large-scale, organized scientific fraud committed by the CCP laboratories and orchestrated by the CCP government. This fraud clearly indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural occurring virus or a simple gain-of-function product that accidentally leaked out from a laboratory. Rather, it must be a deceiving, non-traditional bioweapon created by the CCP regime. We also refuted the claim that the virus was derived from a virus from a mine in Mojiang. Furthermore, the fact that certain fabrications preceded the initial outbreak of COVID-19 suggests that the release of the SARS-CoV-2 must be intentional.
Our two reports were published on zenodo.org as preprint articles. We chose this site and this format because we were fully aware of the censorship on the laboratory origin of SARS-CoV-2 imposed by the top scientists of the field – peer review would not allow our report to be published as it is in a timely manner or at all. The transparency and expedited publication process offered by zenodo, however, were necessary and appropriate in this situation – Dr. Yan and the rest of us wanted the truth of SARS-CoV-2 to be known by the rest of the world as early as possible. Furthermore, peer review is not a guarantee for scientific quality or truthfulness3-7, which is a view shared by many experts, including Dr. Anthony Fauci.
After the publication of our first report, within ten days, two uninvited “peer reviews” were published8,9. As shown in the rest of the document, these reviews were completely mistaken and intentionally misleading. However, they were published on well-known platforms and were produced by “reviewers” who hold high academic titles and are affiliated with prestigious institutions. It was a fine display of the status of personnel and organizations engaged in the CCP’s scientific misinformation.
However, before diving into details of these “peer reviews”, let us travel back in time and take a quick tour to review Dr. Yan’s journey since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as some early events in the origin “debate”.