中共病毒溯源問題白宮在等世衛組織報告

俄羅斯莫斯科喀秋莎農場 仰望七星

編輯上傳 水星

yalibnan.com

3月26日CNN重磅播出羅伯特·雷德菲爾德博士(Robert Redfield)中共病毒來源說【1】,震驚了全美,記者立即追問到了白宮新聞發布會,看看白宮新聞秘書普薩基怎樣說(以下將白宮新聞簡報涉及中共國內容摘譯):【2】

2021年3月26日,新聞秘書詹·普薩基(Jen Psaki)的新聞簡報

新聞發布會
新聞簡報室
……

問:……下面,關於疫情:前CDC主任雷德菲爾德博士今天上午說,他相信病毒來自武漢的實驗室,拜登總統是否對病毒的起源有任何看法,或者美國是否就此得出結論?

普薩基:嗯,你知道,世衛組織正在研究這個問題,不久將發布一份報告,一旦有了那份報告,我們會再看一遍。

我們將繼續更多地了解中共病毒疫情開始的最初幾天,包括它的起源,以便我們能夠更好地為未來的危機做好準備。

我知道瓦倫斯基(Walensky)博士談到了這一點,我認為福奇博士今天上午也談到了這一點,我們將密切關注隨時出現的信息。

問:總統被告知的觀點是由世衛組織的報告,還是他顧問的報告?我是說,他是什麼-

普薩基:當然是他的健康和醫療顧問,因此,他們將審查——當然,當報告和更多數據出現時,他們將審查這些內容和人。

問:最後一個是關於中共國新疆的強迫勞動,一些公司受到了中共國政府的壓力,一些零售商實際上也放棄了不使用該地區強迫勞動生產的產品的承諾。那麼,你知道,美國在做什麼來阻止或製止中共國對導致這一問題的公司進行的這種威脅呢?

普薩基:當然,我們一直在密切關注這個問題,大家都知道,我們也採取了強有力的行動,以防止中共國從新疆可怕的侵犯人權行為中獲利,並阻止從中共國進口強迫勞動生產的產品。

美國消費者和世界各地的消費者應該知道,他們的商品是–他們購買的商品不是用強迫勞動製造的,許多公司都在維護消費者的權利。

我們認為,國際社會應該反對中共國將私營企業依賴市場的行為武器化,以扼殺言論自由,抑製商業道德,所以這是我們密切關注的事情。

當然,我們已經採取了自己的行動,我希望政府和商業部門今天晚些時候對此有更多要說的。

問:接著問一下,因為在本屆政府的頭幾個月裡,你們似乎一直在傳遞這樣的信息,但事實上,中共國似乎更大膽地威脅這些公司,那麼,白宮還能做些什麼來阻止他們做出這些威脅呢?

普薩基:好吧,我們可以與我們的國際夥伴合作,很明顯,正如我所傳達的,我們將如何回擊中共國對私營企業進行武器化的企圖,我們可以像現在這樣公開傳達,當然也可以參與到私營實體企業中來應對(中共國的)這些企圖。

但很多這樣的行動將發生在商業上,在某些情況下,還有國務院,再說一次,我希望他們今天晚些時候會有更多的細節要說。

凱特蘭(Kaitlan),該你問了。

問:有幾個問題,關於世衛組織調查(報告)即將出爐,國家安全顧問傑克·沙利文(Jake Sullivan)幾個月前表示,他們對調查的進行方式深感擔憂,他們還有哪些深切的擔憂嗎?

普薩基:部分原因是由於缺乏透明度,而且缺乏–我們無法確保我們能夠得到可用的數據,所以出現了延遲,他們實際上推遲了那份報告的發表,我們也支持。我們得看一看,確保我們能獲得基本的信息。

問:那麼,如果這份報告出來了,而拜登總統對此並不滿意,會發生什麼呢?

普薩基:是對報告不滿意?

問:(沒聽清)

普薩基:好吧,我們還呼籲進行國際調查,調查發生了什麼事,以及起源–不只是起源,我應該說–中共國缺乏透明度,我們已經恢復或是重新組建了我們在北京的團隊。

那我們看看報告怎麼說,在我們關注的地方,我們會查看底層數據,如果我們可以訪問這些數據的話,然後我們必須通過跨部門的程序來決定下一步的行動。 (摘譯完)

沒有查到新上任的CDC主任倫斯基(Walensky)對中共病毒來源的態度,昨天她的表態是等世衛組織的報告,老賊福奇雖然沒有明確反對雷德菲爾德博士的“起源武漢說”,但其暗示話語充滿了為中共的開脫。

從普薩基的回答獲得的信息如下:

1、“但很多這樣的行動將發生在商業上,在某些情況下,還有國務院,再說一次,我希望他們今天晚些時候會有更多的細節要說。”說明會對中共國有進一步的製裁行動;

2、世衛組織的調查報告被推遲,或者退回補充,不久會發布;

3、“我們已經恢復或是重新組建了我們在北京的團隊”,說明美國在北京有團隊,應該是調查團隊,還是其他?

相關鏈接:

【1】https://gnews.org/zh-hans/1023905/
【2】https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2021/03/26/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-jen-psaki-march-26-2021/

原文部分:

Q: And then, on the pandemic: Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director, said this morning that he believes that the virus originated from the lab in Wuhan. Does President Biden have any views on where the virus may have originated, or has the US come to a conclusion on that yet?

MS. PSAKI: Well, as you know, the WHO is examining this and will be releasing a report soon. We’ll review that report once it’s available.
We continue to learn more about the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its origins, so we can better prepare for future crises.
I know Dr. Walensky addressed this and I think Dr. Fauci did as well this morning, and we’ll look closely at that information when it’s available.

Q: Are the President’s views being informed by that WHO report or his advisors? I mean, what is he–

MS. PSAKI: By his health and medical advisors, certainly. And so they’ll review — they will be, of course, the people reviewing the reports and more data when it becomes available.

Q: And then, last one on the forced labor in Xinjiang, in China. Some companies have come under pressure from the Chinese government, and some retailers have actually dropped pledges not to use products made with forced labor from that region. So, you know, what is the US doing to stop or deter China from making those kind of threats against companies that have resulted in this problem?

MS. PSAKI: Well, we certainly have been watching this issue closely, as you well know, and we’ve taken our own strong actions in order to prevent China from profiting off of its horrific human rights abuses in Xinjiang and to stop imports of products made with forced labor in China.

American consumers and consumers everywhere deserve to know that their goods are — that the goods they are buying are not made with forced labor, and many companies are standing up for consumers’ rights.
The international community, in our view, should oppose China’s weaponizing of private companies’ dependence on its markets to stifle free expression and inhibit ethical business practices. So it is something we are watching closely.

We’ve, of course, taken our own action. I would expect that State and Commerce will have more to say on this later today.

Q:And just one quick follow-up, though. It’s — because it seems like you’ve been having this message out there for the first couple months of this administration, but it’s — China only seems more emboldened to threaten these companies. So what more can be done from the White House to try to deter them from making these threats?

MS. PSAKI: Well, we can work with our international partners, obviously, as I conveyed, on how we’re going to push back on China’s efforts to weaponize private companies. And we can convey publicly, as we are now, and of course engage with private sector entities about these efforts.
But a lot of that action would happen from Commerce and, in some cases, the State Department. And again, I expect they’ll have more specifics to say late

0
0 則留言
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments