Author: Sudorm [㊙️G-Translators/ Authentic Writing Team]
2021-01-19, Dr. Li-Meng Yan and her team openly call for the WHO team to investigate the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the CCP virus, in a scientific manner .
It has been one year since Dr. Li-Meng Yan first alerted, through Lude Media, the world about the CCP virus that would cause a global pandemic. Unfortunately, more than 2 million people have died of the virus, while the world still doesn’t know and we are still not allowed to freely discuss the origin of it. We could simply blame the ignorance of our governments, the arrogance of “scientists” and “experts”, or the propaganda of social media. But it will not change anything. But here is what I can do, to share with you a simple way to distinguish science and pseudoscience. A simple way that might prevent us from the ignorance, the arrogance and the propaganda, the rules of pseudoscience.
The very essence of the scientific methods is about falsifiable hypotheses. If we take the CCP virus as an example, the hypothesis that its origin is from a human lab is falsifiable. The way to prove it is with evidence. Dr. Li-Meng Yan has provided a series of evidence in two scientific reports . If one wants to falsify the lab origin hypothesis, one needs to invalidate the provided evidence or the logic between the evidence and the hypothesis. The invalidation will also be a falsifiable hypothesis that needs to be validated with evidence.
What the so-called scientists and experts are doing, on the other hand, is simply attacking Dr. Yan with words like “overzealous activists, self-appointed detectives, unqualified writers, and politically motivated conspiracy theorists.”. All these personal attacks that prevent others from asking falsifiable questions are non-falsifiable, they are the best practices of pseudoscience.
The important thing here is that all I write here is also falsifiable, and I urge you to think and dig deeper about it yourself. Use the method to have a look at Dr. Yan and her team’s checklist for WHO’s investigation of the CCP virus, and check what WHO will do and respond to it.
Lastly, I will share my favorite story with you, the philosopher goose. A group of gooses live happily in a farm. The farmer comes to feed them with food and treats every morning, and after a while a philosopher goose made a conclusion that the farmer is good for the goose. Next morning, the farmer came with an axe and killed the philosopher goose for dinner. The end of the story will be up to us, there could be another philosopher goose after a while, or many with different views and fighting for the truth.
1. Call for the WHO Team to Investigate the Pangolin Coronaviruses and the RmYN02 Bat Coronavirus
2. Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route
3. SARS-CoV-2 Is an Unrestricted Bioweapon: A Truth Revealed through Uncovering a Large-Scale, Organized Scientific Fraud
(This article only represents the author’s opinion)