Katyusha Farm , Moscow, Russia DongDong
On the morning of December 16, at the regular press conference of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, a spokeswoman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Zhu Fenglian, answered questions on hot issues such as cross-strait political party exchanges, cross-strait military mutual trust and cross-strait cultural exchanges.
A reporter asked, we noticed that the account of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council released a propaganda poster on the day of December 4th, which reads “National Constitution Day, let’s take a look at the provisions of the Constitution on national reunification”. Under the current situation of cross-strait relations, does the release of publicity content in this regard mean that the mainland may launch the National Unification Law? [ 1]
Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council official account on Sina Weibo
Zhu Fenglian said that the Publicity week should have promoted the constitution of the fundamental law of the State. The provisions of the Constitution on national unity are clear. She also said that the CCP would not give up the possibility of the unification of Taiwan by force.
In the Taiwan Affairs Office’s published Constitution and propaganda, the Nine-Dash Line between Taiwan and the South China Sea is marked as red
Regarding the disputed waters of the Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea, the Philippine government has referred the aggression of the CCP to the International Tribunal for Arbitration in The Hague.
On July 12, 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, rendered a ruling in the Philippines’ arbitration case against the expansion of the CCP in the South China Sea. The tribunal, with five arbitrators ruled overwhelmingly in favor of the Philippines on the basis of the mandatory dispute settlement provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea [UNCLOS].
The China Communist Party refuses to participate in the arbitration and rejects the arbitration result , however, in international law, the Philippines is recognized to have most of the claims and interests in the South China Sea.
Image Source: Zhihu website www.zhihu.com
After the Obama administration came to power, the CCP used BGY (blackmail, bribery, sex) means to secretly collude with Obama through the Biden family, and began to blatantly build military facilities in the South China Sea.
The long range conventional naval forces of the CCP, are secretly deployed at strategic locations around Taiwan. As shown in the figure above, the landfill islands in South China Sea are equivalent to an aircraft carrier that does not move at sea. After the establishment of military facilities on all islands, it will work with the Southern Navy Combat command to form a localized military force with great influence and ready to intervene against ASEAN countries.
Photo Source: http://www.takungpao.com/
Military installations in the South China Sea, of the CCP are particularly critical to Taiwan . As shown in the chart above, Taiwan has been a strategic maritime location since ancient times. If the CCP establishes a military base after it takes over the Dongsha islands, it can protect the Greater Bay Area, the core development zone, and further strengthen its control over the South China Sea.
If the dredging works are then realized in Scarborough Shoal, the overall control of the South China Sea route can be achieved. In this way, Japan and South Korea will be strangled, and in cooperation with the construction of the China-Japan-South Korea Free Trade Zone, Japan and South Korea will be forced to change their attitude towards the United States by using carrots and sticks, and finally exclude the United States and achieve the goal of capturing Taiwan.
It is precisely because of the above reasons that Taiwanese media often say that “Taiwan is in danger if the Dongsha is not protected.” On November 16, 2020, according to the official website of the China Maritime Safety Administration, the Guangdong Maritime Safety Administration released directives “Guangdong Navy Patrol 0241” and “Guangdong Navy Patrol 0242”: From November 17 to November 30, the Communist Party of China conducted military training on the west coast of Leizhou Peninsula. From 9:00 to 17:00 on November 17, military training was conducted at sea at the Red Bay . Public opinion in Taiwan is buzzing. Will the Communist Party suddenly seize Dongsha Island?
The Communist Party hopes to capture Taiwan through jurisprudence and force. Dongsha is the key, and taking Dongsha, the CCP wants to stand on the jurisprudence of ownership inthe South China Sea. At this time, completely ignoring the arbitration of the International Tribunal in The Hague. The announcement of the enactment of the unified state law was the tone set by the CCP in terms of jurisprudence and paved the way for subsequent military operations. The United States has long known about the tricks of the Chinese Communist Party
On July 13, U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo issued a “South China Sea-related statement ” on the occasion of the fourth anniversary of the ruling of the “South China Sea Arbitration Case of the Philippines”, demanding that the ruling of the South China Sea arbitration case be judged as a legal basis, denying the legitimate rights and interests of the CCP in the South China Sea .
At this time, the results of the U.S. general election have not been formally submitted to Congress for the decision, and are still in legal proceedings. Taking advantage of the lack of stability in the internal political situation in the United States and the vacuum period of the transfer of power, the CCP continued to carry out military exercises in the South China Sea, while planning to cling to the South China Sea legally, in order to pave the way for follow-up action.
Trump and the righteous people in the United States will not give the CCP any chance to succeed at sneak attacks, nor the America’s strong maritime military power allow the CCP to encroach on the South China Sea, threatening international military security.
 South China Sea Arbitration Case