By 叶子 Edit: andreas (德意志之鹰)
On 11 November 2020, the Trump 2020 Campaign senior adviser for Strategy, Steve Cortes, explained with chalk-talk on Twitter about why substantial votes for Biden are likely fraudulent from a statistical point of view. He also published an Op-Ed on National Pulse about the statistical improbability of the Biden win.
Moreover, the further audit and investigation of Biden’s voting results are urgent and necessary, since the statistic has exposed some compelling evidences.
With detailed statistic examples, he uses four videos to specify the area where further audit and investigation are imperative.
The first video is to look at “turnout”.
Turnout was exceedingly high in the places that Joe Biden needed to excel. But that defies logic of normal statics of voting history of the United States and Abroad.
For example, In Wisconsin, state wide turnout was over 90 percent, which comes near to the 92 percent turnout rate in the country of Australia where voting is mandatory and people could get fined if they don’t vote.
The same circumstances occurred in the city Milwaukee, which was critical for the Wisconsin state.
Milwaukee provided 145,000 votes to Biden and it counted even more than all of the surplus for him in the entire state.
Turnout in Milwaukee was a stunning 84 percent in comparison with the 51 percent turnout rate in Cleveland where is another Midwestern city with a similar demographic and similar size.
Could that be that Milwaukee naturally has much higher turnout rate than Cleveland? How reliable is the turnout rate in Milwaukee? The “turnout” statistics are plainly very suspicious. Those are unanswered questions that need further investigation.
More coming up…