By 莫黎, 舒凡
Democracies do not vanish overnight, they slowly fade into oblivion.
As the mainstream media declared that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election, the disputes between two parties start raging on with no end in sight as alleged examples of voter fraud pouring in.
At the beginning of the counting, President Trump had a great prospect of winning the election. He was ahead of Joe Biden and led in most of the battleground states, such as Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. The triumph was speculated to go to President Trump, even himself stated, “a big win” on Twitter. However, people woke up the next day after the election night finding that Biden has exceeded Trump in Michigan and Wisconsin. Subsequently, Biden surpassed President Trump in other states and eventually even in Electoral College votes which put him at 290.
Under the Electoral College System which is defined by the American Constitution, 50 states and the District of Columbia are apportioned electors based on their population. A presidential candidate needs to win 270 electoral votes out of 538 to secure the presidency. However, could Joe Biden’s enormous upturn really have happened so fast, over one night?
The Impossible Surge in Wisconsin
The votes that enabled Joe Biden to lead in Wisconsin and Michigan were presumably counted during the night after the officials said they had stopped counting. Since Biden outperformed President Trump in those states, there must have numerous ballots to count in one night. Aside from whether it is even possible to count those ballots within several hours when the staff was allegedly resting, it remains a doubtful point.
Biden received almost 100% of the new-counted votes, this means that almost all of those votes went to Biden, not a single one for Trump. According to The Red Elephants, it is a statistical impossibility, the chance of occurring is 0.00000189%. Wisconsin’s voter record has an average of 66.8%, this year’s voter turnout went above for 30%, an unprecedented surge. It should have been impossible if it was not manipulated.
However, this is not the only anomaly that occurred, there are still other doubts regarding Biden’s vote tallies. The State Department and forensics accountants have been using a mathematical method called Benford’s Law, which can be applied for examining electoral fraud.
Benford’s Law also called the Newcomb–Benford law, the law of anomalous numbers, or the first-digit law, is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. The law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the leading digit is likely to be small. For example, in sets that obey the law, the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit about 30% of the time, while 9 appears as the leading significant digit less than 5% of the time. If the digits were distributed uniformly, they would each occur about 11.1% of the time. Benford’s law also makes predictions about the distribution of second digits, third digits, digit combinations, and so on. (Wikipedia)
Below shows the vote tallies in Chicago, Milwaukee, and Allegheny. Every random data set when aggregated, the first numeral will fall within a Benford Curve. The “red lines” on these charts represent where the Benford Curve should fall within the given data set, when something falls outside of a Benford Curve, it is generally considered the data has been manipulated in some way and it is not random. As we can see, all of the other candidates’ tallies follow Benford’s Law, except Biden’s.
Apart from Benford’s Law, people have tried other statistical methods to analyze Biden’s vote tallies, such as Mebane 2nd Digit Test, using the second digit in the total votes to calculate. The result shows that there are multiple significant deviations for Biden while none of the deviations are significant at 5% for Trump. It indicates that the pattern of sudden increasing votes for Biden is abnormal. If it was the opposite case, Biden’s votes would not deviate exceedingly from the expected trajectory.
How Joe Biden Gained Counterfeited Votes
A study by the Judicial Watch claimed that 352 counties in 29 states had 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens. That means the registration rate of those counties exceeds 100%. A table by The Red Elephant shows Milwaukee’s state-wide registration rates.
Clearly, the ineligible persons can also cast votes in Milwaukee without any problem. It could be anyone, even the minor or the deceased, and this is not a separate example. On Thursday, the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) filed a lawsuit and claims that there are at least 21,000 dead people on the state voter rolls, and Pennsylvania failed to “reasonably maintain” their voter registration records under federal and state law in time for the 2020 presidential election. According to PILF, at least 9,212 registrants have been died for at least 5 years, at least 1,990 registrants have been died for at least 10 years, and at least 197 registrants have been died for at least 20 years.
Additionally, an observer in Michigan noticed a registered voter happened to be born in 1902 and passed away in 1984. Apparently, this is not the single case, Joe Biden could have received votes from many more deceased elders. As mentioned earlier, PILF claims that there are at least 21,000 deceased registrants merely in Pennsylvania, if the scope covered nation-wide, it would be difficult to acknowledge how many are out there.
There are more examples of votes from people who lived in the last century. Another poll watcher in Michigan who was later kicked out for taking photographs discovered that there are many voters who were born in the early 1900s.
In Nevada, Clark County Registrar of Voters Joe Gloria revealed that his office received reports of potential voter fraud, but his office will investigate those after the election is completed. The Nevada county accounts for the vast majority of voters in the state, and it’s still counting ballots, the final canvass of votes is on Nov. 16.
A whistleblower, with a sworn affidavit, has claimed that election supervisors of Clark County counted mail-in ballots despite personally witnessing disregard of signature verification.
The Unconstitutional Exception for Pennsylvania
In October, the Supreme Court decided to extend the deadline of Pennsylvania’s mailed-in ballots for three days, which means that all posted ballots arriving at the office before Nov. 6 would be accepted, with the precondition that those votes must have been mailed before Nov. 3. However, the decision by the Supreme Court received a strong objection from the Republicans who claimed it’s a violation of the federal law.
As Jenna Ellis, the Senior Legal Adviser to President Trump addresses on what a potential legal challenge could be, “Pennsylvania executive branch officials have tried to change the law to allow a 3-day late period to accept ballots. That’s unconstitutional. We will take up that case and will fairly and appropriately apply the Constitution, and make sure that every legal vote to be counted, not the illegal and late votes.”
An affidavit from a postal worker in Pennsylvania who talks about having been ordered to illegally put dates on ballots, although no ballots received after the polls closed on the voting day should even be counted. The founder of Project Veritas said that the postal worker’s story line up with the story told by another postal service employee in Traverse City, Michigan. There have certainly been more than two postal offices participating in Biden’s voter fraud, even counting facilities have joined.
Sidney Powell, former federal prosecutor said on Fox News that they’ve identified at least 450,000 ballots in the key states that only have a mark for Joe Biden on them, no other candidate. On the list, there’re 98,000 ballots in Pennsylvania, 80,000 to 90,000 in Georgia, 42,000 in Arizona, 69,000 to 115,000 in Michigan and 62,000 in Wisconsin. Obviously, it appears to be systemic.
The chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, Ronna McDaniel, announces that the Trump campaign has documented irregularities in Michigan. She said that there are over 100 people in both Michigan and Pennsylvania who are willing to go on the record, with sworn affidavits, to testify about voter fraud and irregularities in each state.
The Dominion Voting System
Dominion Voting Systems Corporation was founded in 2003, sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators, in the U.S. and Canada. As of September 2019, Dominion voting machines are used in 2,000 jurisdictions in 33 U.S. states and Puerto Rico.
Numerous allegations of system glitch flipping votes during this presidential election has raised concerns and caused a major controversy about the Dominion system in the past few days.
As reported by Politico, a technology glitch that halted voting in two Georgia counties on Tuesday morning was caused by a vendor uploading an update to their election machines the night before, a county election supervisor said. However, this is not the first time when problems were discovered with the software. In 2013 and 2019, the Dominion was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards.
According to a writer of Fox News, Kyle Becker, who actually took time and did a deep dive into the Dominion Voting System, discovered that the system in Michigan has switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden. Although the Dominion system has been known for some time to be defective, there are 29 states still use it, including Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, Nevada, Minnesota, Georgia, and Michigan.
In January, U.S. lawmakers expressed concern about foreign involvement through the company’s creation and oversight of the election equipment. CEO of Dominion Voting Systems revealed that the company relies heavily on Chinese parts because there is no other alternative. Dominion Voting Systems CEO John Poulos and Hart InterCivic President Julie Mathis said their companies use Chinese-made LCD screen components, chip capacitors, and resistors.
“We would welcome guidelines and best practices from the committee and from the federal government. This is not a problem, that’s unique to the election industry.” Poulos said.
In 2014, the Dominion partnered up with Clinton Global Initiative on the DELIAN Project. The company had on staff former employees of both Clinton Growth Initiative and Clinton tied consulting company, TENEO. In 2015, Washington Post reported that Dominion Voting Systems donated between $25,001 and $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
Many allegations that point to Dominion Voting System’s involvement in voter fraud also due to the company had persons that connected to high-ranking Democrats. The House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s longtime chief of staff, Nadeam Elshami, is a key executive at the Dominion, and Senator Dianne Feinstein’s husband, Richard C. Blum, is a significant shareholder of the company.
The voter fraud in this election, as we are seeing, is quite similar to larceny. It might never be discovered if it was just on a small scale, but the fraud on this large scale definitely cannot stand up to scrutiny. Furthermore, those involved don’t even care to cover the tracks, because they are clearly aware that the mainstream media and Big Tech will do everything necessary to cover for them.
It is everything but normal about this presidential election, and as multiple allegations and massive evidence keep pouring in, the world will soon find out this election is a sham. Who will eventually win the 2020 presidential election? I believe justice will give the answer by January 20th at the latest.