Vaccines or Toxin – Why Are They “Experimental Vaccines”?!

2021/05/20 CCP’s Bioweapon and Unrestricted Warfare

Summary: TCC | PR: BBT | Audit:TCC | Page: Rain

Host: Angela; News collection: TCC; Director Zuma

Full Video Link

This is a very important question. With the understanding of the pros and cons of mRNA vaccines, we can then make the best ‘informed’ decision for us and our family.

1. Adverse Effects of mRNA Vaccines – An Evidence Review from the Penn Medicine Center for Evidence-based Practice (Dec. 2020)

They found out only 7 randomized clinical trials of COVID vaccines reported and the sample sizes of these trials are all small, ranging from 40-300 participants. They have found that there was no guideline available. The only guideline, Public Health England 2020, was based on low quality and limited evidence. The authors also presented several unreported clinical trials. Many of them were not Phase II trials or small sample sizes.

This figure adapted from the paper provides an evidence summary of their research. It is self-explanatory.

TCC Comments: This is a report published by the center of evidence-based practice of the University of Pennsylvania. It is a systemic review of published clinical trial data. As we understand that as a clinical trial, we usually have a team of investigators, patients, and most importantly, a data safety monitoring board. the committee members have to be arm-length, meaning they cannot have any collaborative relationship with the investigators or drug companies. The reason for this committee is to ensure the results can be reviewed on a regular basis and at any given time, if the risk is greater than the benefit, the trial has to be stopped and see which group is causing more harm. For example, there was a vaccine trial for Ebola Virus. They introduced 4 types of treatment and found out there are 2 groups of people who are dying so they have to quickly stop the trial to find out which treatment has problems. In a study without any clinical trial setting, the data collection can be incomplete and under-reporting. For example, current adverse events were self-reporting. If the participant did not report or cannot report, there will be miss information. So, conducting a trial for experimental drug is a critical step.

Adapted from Vaccine Tracker by Blue bar, the time for Phase III clinical trial; orange bar, time for FDA application; Green bar, the time for human inoculation. The X-axis is the chronological date.

The figure above shows that the bottom 4 vaccines from Russia and China, not even start or before the end of clinical trials, have been used for human inoculation.

2. Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

Dr. Vanden Bossche is an independent virologist and vaccine expert, who formerly employed at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He has conducted a series of videos and interviews to make his strong stance to ask the WHO and governments to stop the massive vaccination programs. His key argument is that “massive vaccination with leaky COVID19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants.”

TCC Comment: Dr. Vanden Bossche’s idea on massive vaccination int the heat of pandemic will cause the following key results:

  1. Creating pressure on the virus to induce more variants.
  2. Competing with your own innate immune response which has not only antibodies but NK cells and T-cells. The latter 2 are less specific but effective for COVID variants. With the 13 billion copies of mRNA in each jab of the mRNA vaccine, your immune system is busy creating S-protein induced antibody, and consequently, the function of the innate immune response will be reduced.
  3. These “suboptimal” antibodies (the antibodies created from vaccines will be specific but reduced ability to bind and neutralize the COVID variants) can increase the chance to have Antibody Dependent Enhancement effect.

3. How about other scientists’ opinions on vaccine development with we should stop the experimental program NOW.

A. Dr. Ralph Baric, professor at University North Caroline Chapel Hill. He is one of the gain-of-function researchers, who has worked with Batwoman Shi. In a 2018 video, Baric talked about how difficult and challenging for a vaccine to be developed. He also mentioned that after 40 years, we still have no vaccines for AIDS and after 15 years, we still have no vaccine for SARS-1. How can scientists and doctors develop any vaccine in 3 months?

B. Dr. Richard Fleming, a cardiology and researcher. He is probably the only person to review all FDA applications submitted by big pharma. He revealed that the inadequacy of the vaccine verification and validation. In this clip, he talked about the Mad Cow Disease and Alzheimer-like disease with Lewi body formation at animal studies after vaccination. Most importantly, these effects will only be observed till after 18 months. He also talked about blood clotting problems. The information comes from the application documents from Big Pharma. He has mentioned that there are about 13 billion copies of mRNA of S protein in each jab and these small molecules can pass the blood-brain barriers to cause problems with the central nervous system.

C. We also see that a physician attended a Senate hearing at the State Affairs Committee. When he was asked if infected people should receive the vaccine and if there is an increased risk for those have infected. He talked about that for SARS-1 virus infection, it is found that after 17 years the protection remains to be effective. This is a piece of strong evidence to support that no vaccine is needed after infection with COVID. He also mentioned that vaccination after infection may increase a risk for antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), i.e., increase risks for side effects.

4. Global doctors and scientists fight back

A large team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO, and the Davos Group for crimes against humanity (20210509). They have filed lawsuits against 2 crimes: one is for the inaccuracy of the PRC testing, and two is for experimental vaccines.

A. PCR Testing: Fuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death – as fraud.

The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result. This invalidates over 90% of the alleged Covid cases / “infections” detected by the use of this incorrect test.

B. Experimental Vaccines

The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the USA v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.


These experimental vaccines will not work because the following reasons.

  1. The risks are over benefits. We have seen a lot of adverse events, including neurological degeneration conditions and blood clotting. We have no long-term follow-up information.
  2. Reduction of the host innate immune system.
  3. Suboptimal antibody formation toward COVID19 variants will theoretically increase the chance of the ADE effect. We do not have data so far.

The fact is that we have seen many fully vaccinated people tested positive or infected by COVID19 in the news and scientific reports. Please stop “experimental vaccines” before it’s too late.

Edited by:【Himalaya London Club UK】

Disclaimer: This article only represents the author’s view. Gnews is not responsible for any legal risks.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

英國倫敦喜莊園 Himalaya London Club UK

欢迎战友加入【英国伦敦喜庄园Himalaya London Club UK】 👉GTV频道:; 👉Telegram文宣电台:; May. 25