Himalaya Toronto Maple Leaf Farm, Liberte
What is required to prove a murder in a court of law? A prosecutor would have to: establish the murder weapon; prove intent; show motive; and present evidence of the murder;
I charge the CCP with intentionally committing murder with the genetically modified biological-weapon CCP-virus (Covid-19) and intending to continue this massacre. Let’s look at the evidence proving this allegation of murder by the CCP.
Evidence of death
The bodies are piling up. Across the world nearly 2.7 million people have died so far from CCP-virus biological weapon. In American alone there have been 564,138. This compares to the 420,000 American deaths in World War II.
As mentioned, the murder weapon is the biological weapon developed by the CCP, also known as the CCP-virus or Covid-19.
Intent / Motive / Evidence
What would be the motive of purposely developing and spreading a biological weapon? Quite clearly the same reason the CCP has spent the last 40 years trying to take down the western system of finance, economics, law, justice, religion, faith, and politics – to become the sole and undisputed world hegemon. All the strategies employed by the CCP so far have had the same objective: economic warfare, financial warfare, communications and propaganda warfare, political warfare, technology theft and warfare, infiltration and debt traps, BGY (money, sex, blackmail), Fentanyl warfare, Genocide, subverting international agreements (Sino-British agreement on HK, Law of the Sea, UN Human rights, biological weapons, WTO transgressions…). The CCP has been engaged in undeclared, unrestricted warfare against the west, and in particular the US, for decades. This intent has been verbalized in every meeting of the National Congress of the CCP.
Like any murderer the CCP and its officials attempt not to reveal their intent in public. However, when it comes to such a complex plan as murder through use of a researched and genetically engineered biological weapon, it is inevitable that mistakes will be made, there will be a trace of evidence and “loose lips will sink the ship” as people “in the know” will shoot off their mouths, or boast, in inappropriate ways. The veil is bound to slip. We can survey history to find the evidence we need for this charge of murder.
- Despite signing the Biological Weapons Convention in 1984 which bans biological weapons research, since at least 2007, Chinese Government researchers have been writing publicly about developing bioweapons using “gain-of-function” research to make the viruses more lethal.
- A Chinese military university textbook, “The Unnatural Origin of SARS-CoV and the Man-made Human Novel Virus as a Genetic Bioweapon” was published by the Chinese Military Medical Science Press (CMMSP) in 2015. What is most revealing about this book is how the authors discuss SARS-CoV as being man-made. This book establishes, without a doubt, that the CCP-virus was premeditated at least 20 years ago and created by the CCP .
- The former President of China’s National Defense University wrote in his 2017 book “War’s New High Ground” that biotechnology will enable the development of genetically engineered pathogens that target specific ethnicities.
- China’s top state television commentator revealed that biowarfare using viruses was a new priority under Xi Jinping’s National Security Policy.
- Declassified US intelligence confirms that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) engaged in classified bioweapon research on bat coronaviruses, including animal experiments on behalf of the Chinese military (PLA) since at least 2012.
- In 2018 two cables were sent by US diplomats in China who had made three trips to WIV. The cables warned that the WIV had been doing risky research into how bat coronaviruses can infect human lung cells, and that there was a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate a high-containment laboratory.
- The head of bat coronavirus research at the WIV, Shi Zhengli, told a seminar hosted by Rutgers University that all of the lab’s research was “open” and “transparent”. In fact, as soon as the CCP-virus pandemic broke out in Wuhan, the WIV’s database of research, studies, and database of bat viruses was deleted and has never been revived or released to WHO investigators or other international researchers investigating the source of the CCP-virus.
- Samples from the ground-zero patients in Wuhan have never been released to International investigators.
- The US Government has evidence that the first cluster of CCP-virus cases occurred among personnel of the WIV in the Fall of 2019.
- Major General Chen Wei, the head of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) bioweapons research program travelled to Wuhan to deal with and clean-up the outbreak herself.
- Jin Canrong, a Professor and Associate Dean of the School of International Studies at Beijing’s Renmin University of China, says China needs to “tear down” the US while building itself up. His plans include a wide array of actions they can take to bring the US down including interfering in U.S. elections, controlling the American market, cultivating global enemies to challenge the United States, stealing American technology, expanding Chinese territory, and influencing international organizations. Canrong suggests that China sould side with “those who hate the United States”. The task, he says, is to tear down and then control all other countries, the United States included .
- The CCP-virus has no analog in nature. Its closest cousin is a bat coronavirus originally isolated by the PLA, and then biologically enhanced by the WIV.
- CCP-virus (Covid-19) burrows into human cells using a special tool called a Furin cleavage site. Of the 1,000 coronaviruses in nature that most closely resemble the novel coronavirus that caused the CCP-virus (Covid-19), not one has a similar Furin cleavage site. This strongly suggests that this tool is not a product of natural evolution, but was inserted into the virus.
- The speed at which the CCP-coronavirus has adapted so perfectly to the human host, and the speed at which it has developed such rapid transmissibility does not resemble a natural biological evolution. Normally when a pathogen goes from an animal to a human it takes a while for it to figure out how to become more and more efficient in human-to-human transmission.
- Dr. Li-Meng Yan, in her first report “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route”, provides the most compelling evidence for murder by the CCP. China has claimed that a bat coronavirus named RaTG13 is the closest relative to the COVID-19 virus, but RaTG13 is not actually a virus because no biological samples exist. It is only a genomic sequence of a virus for which there are now serious questions about its accuracy. Dr. Yan suggests that RaTG13 may have been used to divert the world’s attention away from the true source of the COVID-19 pandemic. She claims that the COVID-19 virus originated in laboratories overseen by China’s People’s Liberation Army, using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 collected from Zhoushan, China and used as the viral “backbone” for genetic engineering. Those bat coronaviruses were originally isolated and characterized between July 2015 and February 2017 under the supervision of the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China) and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command (Nanjing, China) .
- The article goes on to explain how the Receptor Binding Motif (RBM), which defines the coronavirus’ ability to bind to the specific human Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor underwent genetic manipulation. That critical segment of the COVID-19 virus is bounded by two “restriction sites” not found in any related bat coronaviruses, which allow researchers to easily splice, that is, cut and paste, components of other viruses into the viral backbone. The presence of those restriction sites is a known marker for genetic manipulation .
- Furthermore, the COVID-19 virus contains a furin polybasic cleavage site with an amino acid sequence of Proline-Arginine-Arginine-Alanine or PRRA that facilitates membrane fusion between the virus and the human cell and is widely known for its ability to enhance pathogenicity and transmissibility. Such a sequence is not found in any other related bat coronavirus and, so far, there is no natural evolutionary pathway identified that could explain the appearance of that PRRA segment. In contrast, techniques for the artificial insertion of such a furin polybasic cleavage site by genetic engineering have been used for over ten years. Dr. Yan and her colleagues note that the two Arginine amino acids in that PRRA segment are coded by the nucleotide sequence CGG-CGG, which rarely appears in tandem and strongly suggests that this furin cleavage site is the result of genetic engineering. In addition, the presence of a “FauI” restriction site at the furin polybasic cleavage site is also an indication of genetic manipulation .
- In her second report ” SARS-CoV-2 Is an Unrestricted Bioweapon: A Truth Revealed through Uncovering a Large-Scale, Organized Scientific Fraud”, Dr. Yan used biological evidence and in-depth analyses to show that SARS-CoV-2 must be a laboratory product, which was created by using a template virus (ZC45/ZXC21) owned by military research laboratories under the control of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government .
- This report concludes that SARS-CoV2 is a product of laboratory modification, which can be created in approximately six months using a template virus owned by a laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The fact that data fabrications were used to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV 2 further implies that the laboratory modification is beyond simple gain-of-function research .
- The scale and the coordinated nature of this scientific fraud signifies the degree of corruption in the fields of academic research and public health. As a result of such corruption, damages have been made both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the well-being of the global community .
- Lastly, Dr. Steven Quay, in his paper “A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived”, looks at 26 pieces of evidence (most of the evidence outlined above) and using conditional probabilities in a Bayesian analysis, concludes that there is a 99.8% probability SARS-CoV-2 came from a laboratory and only a 0.2% likelihood it came from nature .
In summary, your honor, there is overwhelming evidence that the CCP intended to develop a biological weapon, wrote texts about this intent, researched how to develop it, actively sought the most promising bat coronavirus for this purpose, experimented on these viruses using “gain-of-function” methods, and succeeded in developing a final murder weapon called SARS-CoV-2. This weapon subsequently contaminated workers at the WIV, the city of Wuhan, Hubei province and subsequently the entire world, while the CCP actively encouraged the spread, covered it up, and sanctioned doctors who attempted to blow the whistle on this transmission. The only verdict that court can reach is one of murder perpetrated by the CCP.
I rest my case.
 “Dr. Lawrence Sellin: The Unequivocal Evidence Chinese Scientist Dr. Li-Meng Yan Provides Proof COVID-19 was Created by China’s Military”, Joe Hoft, Gateway Pundit, September 15, 2020.
 “New Study By Dr. Steven Quay Concludes that SARS-CoV-2 Came from a Laboratory”, Yahoo Finance, January 29, 2021.
 ” A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived”, Dr. Steven Quay, Zenodo, January 29, 2021.
 “China’s deception over Covid-19’s origins gets more outrageous every day”, Steven Mosher, New York Post, March 27, 2021.
 “The WHO Covid report is fatally flawed and a real investigation has yet to take place”, Josh Rogin, The Washington post, March 29, 2021.
 “Covid Origin Manufactured Virus Known and Taught for Years in Military Textbook”, Brian Sanitizer, GNews, February 27, 2021.
 “Unrestricted Bioweapon”: Chinese Whistleblower releases second paper alleging “Large-scale, organized scientific fraud”, John Titor, WeAreCHange,com, October 8, 2020.
 “The Wuhan Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the Validity of the Yan Reports Are Further Proved by the Failure of Two Uninvited “Peer Reviews””, Dr. Li-Meng Yan et.al, Zenodo, March 31, 2020.
 “CCP Adviser Outlined Detailed Plan to Defeat US”, Steve Ahle, DJHJ Media, March 27, 2021.